01
Coverage
One search rarely shows the whole picture.
We pull from several public routes, then drop the duplicates before you read.
Free preview from public sources
Ask one question. Get an answer you can check.
We look through public news, repos, and research pages, then hand you a short preview with sources, confidence, and what we still can't prove.
Free to tryPublic sources onlySaved in your workspace
What you get
The answer comes with its receipts.
Findings, sources, confidence, and limits stay in one place — so you can judge the result yourself.
01Your question is savedshown
02Public sources are checkedshown
03Evidence is lined upshown
04Preview lands in your workspaceshown
Built for a real headache
Finding stuff is slow. Trusting it is slower.
Most tools stop at a pile of links. We keep the source trail attached to the answer.
02
Trust
A clever answer still needs a paper trail.
Each finding keeps its source nearby — how strong it is, how fresh, where it conflicts.
03
Watching
Nobody can babysit every site forever.
Follow public feeds, sitemaps, and repos with the same repeatable pass.
04
Putting it together
The useful bits live on different sites.
We turn scraps into one evidence list, one careful take, and one next step.
How a preview is put together
From a messy question to something you can inspect.
Collecting, lining up evidence, judging, and handing it over stay separate — so nothing hides in a black box.
Cast a wider net
Pull from public search, news, repos, RSS, and sitemaps around one question.
Keep the snapshot
Save the URL, what we could read, and any access limits next to each find.
Build the evidence chain
Tie the answer to what supports it, what pushes back, and what is still fuzzy.
Weigh both sides
Show what strengthens a claim, what weakens it, and what we simply don't know yet.
Watch for changes
Keep an eye on feeds, sitemaps, repos, and pages you care about.
Shape a short brief
Pack findings, confidence, limits, and open questions into something readable.
Check against sources
Every claim in the summary has to match a cited source. Lines that don't hold get cut.
Stay inside safe tools
Only approved public routes, with checks and limits on what can run.
Free first, deeper later
Free previews show up right after automatic checks. Paid formal reports add a person who walks the evidence path.
The short version
Question in. Report-shaped answer out.
Each step does one job and leaves something you can look at later.
01Name the questionWhat are you checking, and what decision does it need to support?
02Gather public evidenceSearch the allowed routes, read what is open, keep the trail.
03Judge the signalWeigh support, pushback, and uncertainty — and write the limits down.
04Check and publishAutomatic source checks unlock the free preview. Formal reports can still add a human pass.
Inside a LumenRadar report
The conclusion is just the opening line.
See how sources, conflicting signals, confidence, limits, and the next step stay tied together.
Supplier risk and market readiness brief
A sample of how claims, evidence, and limits stay connected.
Supported
Demand points the same way
Independent sources agree on direction.
Needs a closer look
Timing is still fuzzy
Sources disagree on when adoption lands.
Thin evidence
One dependency still needs proof
We mark the gap instead of faking certainty.
Where signals come from
Public signals, sorted in one place.
We use public routes for discovery and evidence. Internal tooling stays out of your way.
Web searchBroader discovery
News searchFresh signals
GitHubRepo evidence
Readable pagesClean public text
RSS & sitemapsSteady watching
Evidence reviewConfidence & limits
Try it free
Start with the question already on your mind.
Generate a free public-source preview first. It shows up after automatic checks. A formal reviewed report is optional and paid — it never blocks the free preview.